By:
Kyrsten Cazas, Community & Visibility Specialist
Green·wash (grēn'wŏsh', -wôsh')
– verb:
the act of misleading consumers regarding the environmental practices
of a company or the environmental benefits of a product or service. –
TerraChoice Environmental Marketing Inc., 2007.
Last year, Britain’s Channel 4 released a documentary that investigated
claims by the California-based Fiji Water company that, as a way to reduce its
carbon footprint, it would plant four square miles of trees in Fiji
between 2007 and 2010.
But investigators found
that, as of mid-2011, the company had only planted 1.4 square miles of trees
with no evident plan to fulfill its promise.
By then we’d all heard of Fiji
Water, which the company touts as
being “drawn from an artesian aquifer that lies hundreds of feet below the
edges of a primitive rainforest” in an “isolated and idyllic setting.” Its
claims of environmental friendliness and pretty illustrated bottles have landed
Fiji in the hands of some much-photographed celebs, on the tables of many ritzy
restaurants and even on some prime-time hit TV shows.
But plain old common sense can
tell anyone that Fiji Water’s claims are dubious, at best. Fiji Water is
collected on an island way out in the
Pacific Ocean. Which means that it is collected thousands of miles from pretty
much anywhere; the closest large market for this water, Australia/New Zealand,
is, at its closest point, about
1,300 miles away. Just imagine the volume of CO₂ emissions it must take to fly and truck this stuff to, say,
Manhattan, London or Miami?
An overload of green marketing –
as well as an epidemic of misleadingly-labeled or marketed products
(clean coal, anyone?) – has left consumers feeling the effects of eco-fatigue
for several years now.
After all, how much eco-hype can
a weary mass of befuddled consumers take? It doesn’t help when Stanford
University tells us that much-hyped pricey organic foods – which pulled
in about $29.2 billion last year – aren’t any more nutritious than regular
foods, although they do reduce exposure to pesticides.
But still, this eco-fatigue is
reflected in changing consumer attitudes toward “green” products.
A recent Green Gauge survey
by GfK shows that 93% of consumers say they’ve changed their household behavior
to save energy, but are less willing this year to pay more for products labeled
as “environmentally-friendly” than they were in 2008.
So consumers have spoken and it’s
going to be much harder for deceptive marketers to greenwash products. The
Federal Trade Commission recently released new rules
that require marketers of “green” products to back up their claims with hard
data – including proof that a salient benefit isn’t canceled out by toxic
aspects of production or distribution.
And it’s about time, too.
Greenwashers who deceive
consumers do everyone – including their own brands, when the deception is
discovered – a huge disservice. They are particularly harmful to the genuine
environmental movement which is trying to address real dangers, such as the
climate change, pollution and deforestation that threaten our planet – and
ultimately the survival of our species.
Who feels as strongly against
greenwashing as I do? I would love to
hear from you, and especially if you’ve been the victim of greenwashing.
No comments:
Post a Comment